| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. Dev Blog: CSM8 Elections GÇô Schedule and Election Process - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Jassmin Joy wrote: Not sure if this should be asked somewhere else, but is there a specific reason for cms's needing to be over 21? Just one of those old rules that we're sticking to, or is there something i'm not getting at first glance? Th...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.02.21 13:59:00
|
62. Dev Blog: CSM8 Elections GÇô Schedule and Election Process - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Is there still no change to the policy of revealing candidate real names publically on the Internet? I wonder how many potentially great representatives we're missing out on because they don't want to be e-stalked for blowing up someone's Internet...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.02.21 12:53:00
|
63. Sticky:Dev blog: The great ship skill change of summer 2013 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'd like to question some of the carrier skills: Why Capital Ships 4 for regular carriers? Why not 3 for normal carriers + dreads and 4 for Supercarriers? Why JFC 4 for carriers when JDC is only at 3? They're arguably more useful the other way ar...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.02.07 14:14:00
|
64. RMTing... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Anndy wrote: look who happens to control the CSM now I give up, who is that? Apathy. Anndy wrote: baltec1 wrote: Anndy wrote: yes because getting massive numbers and throwing them all into a single system...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.02.06 22:55:00
|
65. Removal of passive resist bonus on shield/armour hardeners - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: tl;dr yes, this has been removed, because we felt that for a number of reasons it wasn't a function we wanted on active hardeners This bonus came to the top of our work due to a defect, which prompted us to discuss whethe...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.01.28 15:35:00
|
66. [Proposal] Sovereignty Revamp - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Reiisha wrote: So riddle me this, why are the only people complaining about this proposal Goonswarm members, alts or pets? Once it hit the point where you failed to take in the constructive criticism offfered and failed to notice the parts...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.01.03 23:24:00
|
67. [Proposal] Sovereignty Revamp - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Reiisha wrote: It can't be based on anything else if you want to get away from the structure grind. That's the entire issue. The values on which activity is based are TBD of course after a lot of testing. I don't really see any downsides to t...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.01.03 11:24:00
|
68. Was it better with the old SOV mechanics? A Serious Debate! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Malcanis wrote: A more "easy come easy go" system would allow smaller organisations to at least mount a credible multi-front campaign against a larger opponent. At the very least, the defender shouldn't be allowed to remotely set timers. At le...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.01.02 18:18:00
|
69. Was it better with the old SOV mechanics? A Serious Debate! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Both systems have benefits to them. The trouble is that CCP didn't really learn from the flaws of the old POS system and just shuffled things around a bit. The long structure grinds of mutiple POSes were replaced by easier-to-defend grinds of sov ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.01.02 17:37:00
|
70. Whats up with module bonus restrictions? - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Can anyone check which ship gives a racial bonus to paragraph size? I need to know what this guy is flying.
- by CynoNet Two - at 2013.01.02 13:08:00
|
71. Intrepid Crossing HIGH COMMAND would like to know why you're not showing up ... - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Pinky Starstrider wrote: Why is it GSF numbers have decline nearly 70% across all time zones? Why has your posting quality declined nearly 70% across all time zones?
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.10.13 11:04:00
|
72. Deep Space Transports in Deep Space - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Scatim Helicon wrote: Yeah, DSTs are too slow to avoid the regular points that usually accompany the bubble, so pretty much the only time this is useful is for getting past a solo dictor without a warp disruptor fitted. Bubble immunity on top ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.08.27 12:36:00
|
73. Deep Space Transports in Deep Space - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I guess this isn't a major game-breaking issue, but I think it would be interesting, so what the hell. Right now everyone uses DST's for one of two main things: In hi-sec they offer a harder-to-gank platform for mid-sized cargo. In low-sec and n...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.08.27 02:13:00
|
74. 13 x PLEX Purchase ISHUKONE SHIRT --> 50 Cents *****? Reparation Please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The Antiquarian wrote: And CCP, is there a reason why you are not letting us know of your decision? You claimed that you will provide us with information on Friday, but it's already Wednesday now. Do you really wish us to continue this senseles...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.07.03 23:20:00
|
75. Ship aligning to magnetic field please wait... - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
DingoGS wrote: Since 1.1, after your ships lands from the warp you cant use any active mods until you perform a move action. It's almost as if CCP want to introduce some risk to ships that can align quickly, warp cloaked, and wipe out entir...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.07.02 19:56:00
|
76. CCP needs to take a hard look at Goonswarm and Hulkageddon to save EVE. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Goons want to make every other possibly dangerous PvP entity weaker (see cries to get nerfed supercaps). Here's my FACT OF THE DAY, exclusively for you! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Q1lrH_B-VI This video shows t...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.05.31 11:47:00
|
77. Is it time for Technetium to crash? - in Market Discussions [original thread]
cigarellos wrote: The past week, close to 500k units of Technetium passed through my hands so I know those 732,514 units needed to crash the price to 95k ISK are CHUMP CHANGE. So what is it going to be? Is it time for OTEC to suck toda...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.05.28 22:40:00
|
78. Goonageddon - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Miilla wrote: Isn't creating characters with SIMILAR names to other's for negative reasons against the char naming rules? To be fair, it's not as bad an offense as posting that badly. You'd think someone with BILLIONS OF REAL LIFE ISK would ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.05.26 15:33:00
|
79. War vs Goonswarm - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh man we're never had wardecs before what are we ever going to do. Boy do we have egg on our faces right now
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.05.25 14:51:00
|
80. Sticky:EVE Online: Inferno - Feedback thread - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Reposting this here in the hope of a CCP response: CCP Masterplan wrote: Yes. Although in your example (where the ship was removed from space once its timer had expired) you'll be warping back from a random 1M km point. If someone manages to fi...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.05.23 09:27:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |